through these years the history we are forced upon are fake not representing Nepal or Nepalese, all the date era described in the books are either of Kathmandu valley or Gorkha. before prithvi Narayan captured Kathmandu it was based on Kathmandu only after his so called unification the next place is Gorkha and than it comes back to Kathmandu valley. so does this mean other places beside these two doesn't have history? we know little bit about other places like Palpa Butwal or Nuwakot only because of the presence of shah king. isn't it high time other places got their names in the history books?
just a thought

.

what do you mean i need to know nepal history. Is it that so important?
Afterall nepal history is not complete and most of it is based on a lie.

yes, it is true that Nepal history is not complete.

Nepali history cover just to Shah, Rana, Thakuri, Kathmandu, patan, kirtipur and bhaktapur.

There is a shameful huge gap Ancient time of Nepal, Nepal 13th century to 17th century history.

Baburam Acharya just fullfill to Shah and Rana to get Award and Honor from them.

If you ask Nepal history to Nepalese people who did in Master Degree in Nepal history and PHD, they will flunk about Ancient history and Medival time 13-17th century Nepal history. Because they just read a book of Baburam Acharya.

So they lost 70% Nepali history education even they claim as a high educated people.

It is Shame.....